RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05798
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Fitness Assessments (FA) dated 29 Dec 11 and 26 Sep 12, be
removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her first FA failure was due to a sexual assault that occurred on
11 Dec 11, and she was still recovering from the sustained
injuries. The second FA failure was due to her diagnosis of
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) from the sexual assault.
The applicant did not provide any documentation in support of her
request.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of senior airman.
The following is a summary of the applicants previous FA scores:
Date Cardio AC (in) Push- Sit- Composite Fitness
Results Score Ups Ups Score Score Level
7/13 49.30 16.50 5.00 0.00 70.80 Unsat
12/12 55.30 15.20 8.30 6.00 84.80 Sat
9/12 46.90 16.50 7.50 3.00 73.90 Unsat
3/12 54.20 20.00 7.30 6.80 88.30 Sat
12/11 51.20 20.00 8.60 3.00 82.80 Unsat
9/11 46.90 20.00 8.10 0.00 75.00 Unsat
6/10 39.00 26.25 8.25 7.00 80.50 Good
Contested FAs.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states that the applicant
has not clearly demonstrated an error or injustice.
DPSIM states that without any documentation to support her
claim, they cannot determine the validity of the error or
injustice.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 19 Sep 13, for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit C). As of this date, this office has not received a
response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the
applicant has failed to sustain her burden that she has been the
victim of an error of injustice. Should she provide
documentation to support her contentions, we would be willing to
reconsider her request. In view of the above and in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered BC-2012-05798 in
Executive Session on 17 Dec 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Dec 12.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 21 Aug 13.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Sep 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05762
The 30 Space Wing Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) would not allow him to take another official AC measurement that same day, so he retook the test on 5 Dec 12. On 4 Dec 12, the applicant took his FA; however, he did not meet the minimum requirement for the AC component with a measurement of 40. On the same day, his commander approved his request to retest within the 42 day reconditioning period in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program. We took notice of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04848
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04848 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 9 Apr 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04441
On 20 Feb 14, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB), stating there was not enough or specific details of the medical condition provided from the applicants medical provider. A list of the applicants last 10 FAs is as follows: Date Composite Score Sit-Ups Rating 5 Feb 14 82.00 Exempt Satisfactory 19 Jun 13 79.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Feb 13 85.00 Exempt Satisfactory *27 Dec 12 23.50 39/0.00 Unsatisfactory 25 Jun...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03078
A list of the applicants last five FA results is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 19 Aug 13 88.75 Exempt Satisfactory 13 May 13 35.60 15:45/0.00 Exempt 8 Nov 12 92.00 Exempt Excellent 14 Aug 12 28.80 18:01/0.00 Unsatisfactory 16 Feb 12 91.75 Exempt Excellent *26 Nov 11 42.30 16:49/8.30 Unsatisfactory *26 Jul 11 35.70 18:52/0.00 Unsatisfactory 31 Jan 11 84.00 Exempt Satisfactory 25 Nov 10 27.50 Incomplete/0.00 Unsatisfactory 24 May 10 78.00 13:11/36.00 Good *Contested FA On 14...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02587
In support of his claim, the applicant has submitted a letter from his UFPM and a Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical care, indicating that he had an illness, precluding him from finishing and passing the contested FA and memorandum from his UFPM (not dated) to the Force Support Squadron commander requesting removal of the contested FA from AFFMS. If an AF Form 422 is required, an additional 7 days will be allowed for the AF Form 422 to be generated and provided. A list of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02538
For RegAF and AGR Airmen, the FAC (or UFPM where no FAC exists) will enter the FA results in AFFMS on the 6th duty day if the Commander does not invalidate test results or no response from the Commander is received within this timeframe; Atch 1, Para 10a. Commander memorandum, medical docs, or FAC memorandum). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the contested FA from AFFMS,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03631
Additionally, the PCM states the FA failure/weight gain may have had something to do with insufficient synthroid dose; once again, this does not definitively indicate the failed FA was due to a pre-existing medical condition. The applicant has failed to provide sufficient evidence to exempt him from the FA. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04605
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04605 XXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 12 Sep 13 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02580
A list of the applicants complete FA history is as follows: Date Composite Score Cardio Rating 4 Aug 2013 33.00 17:41/0.00 Unsatisfactory *5 May 2013 26.50 INC/0.00 Unsatisfactory 14 May 2012 91.70 12:19/57.60 Satisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB), on the basis of Insufficient evidence; specifically AF Form 422 and medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05279
On 25 Oct 13 she received an updated AF Form 469, stating that she was exempt from the cardio component of the FA. The applicant's AF Form 469 shows the cardio limitations expired on 23 Sep 13, which would have allowed the applicant to complete the cardio component of the FA. The applicant did not provide an updated AF Form 469 to show the exemption expired on a later date.